Login to the feedback application
You have received an email with your login credentials. These are unique to you
and should not be shared with anyone else in the organization.
The application is behind a Google firewall. To access the application you need to sign in via Google with the provided credentials:
First open the feedback portal (see the link in the mail)
Enter email address (the one provided to you “feedback _user…@iconic.works”)→ click Next
Enter password (the one provided to you)→ click Next
Note: if you are already signed in with a different Google account, please switch accounts to make sure you use the one provided by us.
Once you are signed in, please first turn on 2-step verification.
Turn on 2-step verification
You need to turn on 2-step verification, otherwise you will be locked out of your account.
Open https://accounts.google.com
Note: make sure you are in the Google account provided by Iconic Works, otherwise switch Google accounts in the right top corner, via the drop down menu.
Click Security in the left menu.
Click 2-Step Verification under “How you sign in to Google”
Click Authenticator at the bottom
Click Set up authenticator
Install any authenticator app on your phone, like Google Authenticator
Scan the QR code → enter the QR code
Click Turn on 2-step Verification
You should see “You’re now protected with 2-Step Verification”
Click Done
Open the feedback tool
You are now ready to start with the tool:
→ Open the feedback portal (see the link in the mail)
→ Open the active Annotation Queue to see the list of findings.
Please note: the tool is designed with the sole purpose of collecting your feedback, so this is not the end product!
Instruction to provide feedback
Click on a finding on the left-side
Read the finding details on the right-side
Use the search function (above the document) to locate the issue in the document
Note: automated highlighting is a feature we will add in the near future.
Give your feedback on the right-side
How to give feedback?
Give each finding a Severity score Low, Medium or High.
Note: we haven’t defined these levels on purpose. Please rate based on your own judgment. Your explanation in the comment box helps us understand your reasoning and refine how we classify findings in the future.
Rate the finding (on bottom right of the page) based on the following scale
High Confidence – Relevant: Clear, meaningful issue — confident this is valid.
Medium Confidence – Likely Relevant: Likely valid, but missing full context to be fully confident.
Medium Confidence – Likely Not Relevant: Probably a false positive, but miss the full context to be fully confident.
High Confidence – Not Relevant: Not relevant: Confidently not a valid issue.
I am not able to rate this finding
Give your verbal (use the microphone button) or written feedback in the field Why This Rating?
Note: we really appreciate detailed feedback. The more you share, the better context we have to improve the AI model.
If the microphone is not working, please enable it first. Typically the address indicates that you need to allow the microphone for this website)
Optionally: Use the 👍 and 👎 to give feedback on individual fields, such the Description, Reasoning and References, with optionally your verbal/written feedback per field.
Please work through all the findings in the queue, so we collect enough data points to improve the AI model.
That is it!
We really appreciate you make the time to give feedback! For support, please find the contact details in the email.
That is it!
We really appreciate you make the time to give feedback!
For support, please find the contact details in the email.